<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re a Mean One, Mr. GIMP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/12/09/gimp-windows-crashes-on-new-file/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/12/09/gimp-windows-crashes-on-new-file/</link>
	<description>free software, free culture, free association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:53:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/12/09/gimp-windows-crashes-on-new-file/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 01:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/12/09/gimp-windows-crashes-on-new-file/#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Hi, Michael.  Thanks for your comment -- I think you&#039;re right on the money.

To get the GIMP, I started from gimp.org/windows which points to &lt;a href=&quot;http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/&lt;/a&gt; (gimp-win.sf.net redirects there).  The original install was simple and painless.

I have Gaim and didn&#039;t even think of it as a related application.  It seems like such a &quot;small&quot; app that I wouldn&#039;t have given much thought to its own graphical underpinnings and that it might share libraries.  I can&#039;t remember the chronology of when I installed the two applications, but a conflict sounds plausible based on that bug report.

Shared libraries and reuse are good things, of course, but with larger hard drives I don&#039;t object to private copies of libraries.  Of course, now I know better about what to look for in resolving sharing problems.  It&#039;s all a matter of perspective.  (Panicked newbieness versus calmer experience.)

Do you work on the GIMP?  I hope I didn&#039;t sound overly negative in my post.  I really think it&#039;s a fantastic application and am grateful for all the work that people are putting in to it.  I&#039;m trying to document my struggles with learning this stuff while at the same time hopefully not coming across as too much of a sniveling ingrate. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Michael.  Thanks for your comment &#8212; I think you&#8217;re right on the money.</p>
<p>To get the GIMP, I started from gimp.org/windows which points to <a href="http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/</a> (gimp-win.sf.net redirects there).  The original install was simple and painless.</p>
<p>I have Gaim and didn&#8217;t even think of it as a related application.  It seems like such a &#8220;small&#8221; app that I wouldn&#8217;t have given much thought to its own graphical underpinnings and that it might share libraries.  I can&#8217;t remember the chronology of when I installed the two applications, but a conflict sounds plausible based on that bug report.</p>
<p>Shared libraries and reuse are good things, of course, but with larger hard drives I don&#8217;t object to private copies of libraries.  Of course, now I know better about what to look for in resolving sharing problems.  It&#8217;s all a matter of perspective.  (Panicked newbieness versus calmer experience.)</p>
<p>Do you work on the GIMP?  I hope I didn&#8217;t sound overly negative in my post.  I really think it&#8217;s a fantastic application and am grateful for all the work that people are putting in to it.  I&#8217;m trying to document my struggles with learning this stuff while at the same time hopefully not coming across as too much of a sniveling ingrate. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schumacher</title>
		<link>http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/12/09/gimp-windows-crashes-on-new-file/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schumacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/12/09/gimp-windows-crashes-on-new-file/#comment-655</guid>
		<description>Reading this post makes me wonder where you did get GIMP - http://gimp-win.sf.net or somewhere else? Everything you need is available as an installer there, and the site is linked from  http://www.gimp.org/windows/.

The description sounds like you got hit by bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314529 
Do you have Gaim installed?

More recent versions (used for the development builds) of the GIMP installer include GTK+ and Glib and install a private copy - IMO an unfortunate development, but it seems to be impossible to guarantee that one shared install does work with all gtk+-based apps on one system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this post makes me wonder where you did get GIMP &#8211; <a href="http://gimp-win.sf.net" rel="nofollow">http://gimp-win.sf.net</a> or somewhere else? Everything you need is available as an installer there, and the site is linked from  <a href="http://www.gimp.org/windows/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gimp.org/windows/</a>.</p>
<p>The description sounds like you got hit by bug <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314529" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314529</a><br />
Do you have Gaim installed?</p>
<p>More recent versions (used for the development builds) of the GIMP installer include GTK+ and Glib and install a private copy &#8211; IMO an unfortunate development, but it seems to be impossible to guarantee that one shared install does work with all gtk+-based apps on one system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
