Comments on: Stephan Kinsella, ‘Against Intellectual Property’ http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/ free software, free culture, free association Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:27:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Steve http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-3620 Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:11:50 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-3620 This is a fascinating article (relevant to my interests since I'm in Trademark Law.) Thank you so much. This is a fascinating article (relevant to my interests since I’m in Trademark Law.) Thank you so much.

]]>
by: Scott Carpenter http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-3480 Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:13:56 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-3480 Thanks, Max! Thanks, Max!

]]>
by: Max Smith http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-3479 Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:49:19 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-3479 This whole article rocked, but the last line sums it up nicely. "It’s silly. And worse, it’s harmful." Excellent, I couldn't have said it better myself!!! -M This whole article rocked, but the last line sums it up nicely.

“It’s silly. And worse, it’s harmful.”

Excellent, I couldn’t have said it better myself!!!

-M

]]>
by: Amy Stephen http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-373 Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:42:39 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-373 Wow. You are to be encouraged. :) Wow. You are to be encouraged. :)

]]>
by: Scott Carpenter http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-280 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 02:25:24 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-280 Thanks for the pointers, Stephan. Will have to read more about this. It makes sense that first possessors should be able to claim some amount of land that they can reasonably put to use, but how about this one: We develop advanced nanotechnology and space travel capable of bringing us to a single inhabitable world. Various groups are working to make the journey, and one of them would be the first to arrive on the planet with self-replicating machines. Within a few days or weeks, these machines have built an infrastructure spanning the new world. Have these few people effectively asserted a claim based on putting the land to active use? When the next batch of settlers arrives--not to mention the billions of other people who may have wanted to move off the crowded home planet--are they out of luck? In that situation, it may be hard to find arbitrators with sufficient expertise to judge the matter. Just thinking out loud. My reading list is always growing but I'll get to those links -- thanks again for sharing them. Thanks for the pointers, Stephan. Will have to read more about this.

It makes sense that first possessors should be able to claim some amount of land that they can reasonably put to use, but how about this one: We develop advanced nanotechnology and space travel capable of bringing us to a single inhabitable world.

Various groups are working to make the journey, and one of them would be the first to arrive on the planet with self-replicating machines. Within a few days or weeks, these machines have built an infrastructure spanning the new world.

Have these few people effectively asserted a claim based on putting the land to active use? When the next batch of settlers arrives–not to mention the billions of other people who may have wanted to move off the crowded home planet–are they out of luck?

In that situation, it may be hard to find arbitrators with sufficient expertise to judge the matter.

Just thinking out loud. My reading list is always growing but I’ll get to those links — thanks again for sharing them.

]]>
by: Stephan Kinsella http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-276 Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:53:46 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-276 For more elaboration on the nature of homesteading, see: How We Come To Own Ourselves and Defending Argumentation Ethic, available at http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications.php#rightsth. See also Rothbard, Ch. 8 of Ethics of Liberty: http://www.mises.org/rothbard/ethics/eight.asp "Some theorists have maintained—in what we might call the “Columbus complex”—that the first discoverer of a new, unowned island or continent can rightfully own the entire area by simply asserting his claim. (In that case, Columbus, if in fact he had actually landed on the American continent—and if there had been no Indians living there—could have rightfully asserted his private “ownership” of the entire continent.) In natural fact, however, since Columbus would only have been able actually to use, to “mix his labor with,” a small part of the continent, the rest then properly continues to be unowned until the next homesteaders arrive and carve out their rightful property in parts of the continent." and: Rothbard, in Law Property Rights and Air Pollution: http://www.mises.org/story/2120 "In our discussion of homesteading, we did not stress the problem of the size of the area to be homesteaded. If A uses a certain amount of a resource, how much of that resource is to accrue to his ownership? Our answer is that he owns the technological unit of the resource. The size of that unit depends on the type of good or resource in question, and must be determined by judges, juries, or arbitrators who are expert in the particular resource or industry in question." For more elaboration on the nature of homesteading, see: How We Come To Own Ourselves and Defending Argumentation Ethic, available at http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications.php#rightsth.

See also Rothbard, Ch. 8 of Ethics of Liberty: http://www.mises.org/rothbard/ethics/eight.asp “Some theorists have maintained—in what we might call the “Columbus complex”—that the first discoverer of a new, unowned island or continent can rightfully own the entire area by simply asserting his claim. (In that case, Columbus, if in fact he had actually landed on the American continent—and if there had been no Indians living there—could have rightfully asserted his private “ownership” of the entire continent.) In natural fact, however, since Columbus would only have been able actually to use, to “mix his labor with,” a small part of the continent, the rest then properly continues to be unowned until the next homesteaders arrive and carve out their rightful property in parts of the continent.”

and: Rothbard, in Law Property Rights and Air Pollution: http://www.mises.org/story/2120

“In our discussion of homesteading, we did not stress the problem of the size of the area to be homesteaded. If A uses a certain amount of a resource, how much of that resource is to accrue to his ownership? Our answer is that he owns the technological unit of the resource. The size of that unit depends on the type of good or resource in question, and must be determined by judges, juries, or arbitrators who are expert in the particular resource or industry in question.”

]]>
by: Crosbie Fitch http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-265 Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:17:41 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-265 Privacy, Truth, and Liberty. What more can an artist need? <i>I will not accept the enslavement of my fellow man, nor any imposition upon his liberty, as reward for the publication of my art.</i> Privacy, Truth, and Liberty.

What more can an artist need?

I will not accept the enslavement of my fellow man, nor any imposition upon his liberty, as reward for the publication of my art.

]]>
by: Scott Carpenter http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-263 Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:09:56 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-263 Stephan Kinsella? Really? Thank you. Stephan Kinsella? Really? Thank you.

]]>
by: stephan kinsella http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-260 Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:41:10 +0000 http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/10/29/stephan-kinsella-against-intellectual-property/#comment-260 Great post. Great post.

]]>