<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metapost: So close, yet so far&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/</link>
	<description>free software, free culture, free association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Seems that comment posting works again. Thanks.

Also, that &quot;remember me&quot; is actually always on, rather than missing, here. :)

I am saddened by the recent decline on Copyfight. Reluctantly deleted my own bookmark recently. It&#039;s not just the current state but the trend, steadily downwards; Question Copyright seems to be nearly new and with (at least right now) only one author, whereas Copyfight is (or was) coblogged by several.

I notice the link lists (at least the Alpha one) seems to rearrange randomly on every page load -- interesting.

Any idea if a standard-issue generic PC PSU will fit in a somewhat dated Compaq Presario 6000, by the way? I hear those (and HP, now merged; also Dell) don&#039;t always have standard-sized parts. If I can revive the dead box it would make a serviceable Ubuntu test-bed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that comment posting works again. Thanks.</p>
<p>Also, that &#8220;remember me&#8221; is actually always on, rather than missing, here. :)</p>
<p>I am saddened by the recent decline on Copyfight. Reluctantly deleted my own bookmark recently. It&#8217;s not just the current state but the trend, steadily downwards; Question Copyright seems to be nearly new and with (at least right now) only one author, whereas Copyfight is (or was) coblogged by several.</p>
<p>I notice the link lists (at least the Alpha one) seems to rearrange randomly on every page load &#8212; interesting.</p>
<p>Any idea if a standard-issue generic PC PSU will fit in a somewhat dated Compaq Presario 6000, by the way? I hear those (and HP, now merged; also Dell) don&#8217;t always have standard-sized parts. If I can revive the dead box it would make a serviceable Ubuntu test-bed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Maybe I need to follow Stephen Colbert&#039;s lead and have &quot;on notice&quot; and &quot;dead to me&quot; link sections. :-)

Posting frequency isn&#039;t critical to me, I think I&#039;d keep linking to &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.questioncopyright.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Question Copyright&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; even if new posts dried up completely, as long as they host &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.questioncopyright.org/node/1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Promise of a Post-Copyright World&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, for which I&#039;m very grateful.

I appreciate your feedback.  I&#039;d like to keep my links section somewhat dynamic and plan on adding and removing links regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I need to follow Stephen Colbert&#8217;s lead and have &#8220;on notice&#8221; and &#8220;dead to me&#8221; link sections. :-)</p>
<p>Posting frequency isn&#8217;t critical to me, I think I&#8217;d keep linking to <i><a href="http://www.questioncopyright.org/" rel="nofollow">Question Copyright</a></i> even if new posts dried up completely, as long as they host <i><a href="http://www.questioncopyright.org/node/1" rel="nofollow">The Promise of a Post-Copyright World</a></i>, for which I&#8217;m very grateful.</p>
<p>I appreciate your feedback.  I&#8217;d like to keep my links section somewhat dynamic and plan on adding and removing links regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movingtofreedom.org/2006/09/25/metapost-so-close-yet-so-far/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>I vote &quot;no&quot; to &quot;blong&quot;. Avoiding clutter helped catapult Google to glory, which should tell you something.

I also recommend dumping the link to Copyfight. It&#039;s really gone to pot of late. For months the rate of addition of new material has been declining, to the point that it&#039;s now abysmal (&lt;i&gt;maybe&lt;/i&gt; one new post in a given week), and there have been technical problems that developed, but were not fixed (even when pointed out) -- the &quot;remember me&quot; feature (which I note is lacking here) quit working (but wasn&#039;t removed, either) and their &quot;blinks&quot; started to always show as having zero comments, however many they actually had.

But the final straw is censorship(!) -- they changed something recently so all comments go through moderation, rather than appearing immediately, and to make matters worse, began to reject the vast majority of (non-link-spam) comments, including all from anonymizer IPs (such as The Cloak). They also seem to have blackholed at least one large Canadian ISP, without explanation or even acknowledgement, and which from what I&#039;ve been able to determine is the broadband monopoly in the capital city(!) and large chunks of the surrounding area.

Whether this is Copyfight or their host, Corante, misbehaving, I don&#039;t know; but it probably doesn&#039;t matter. (Corante has a feedback form, and messages with valid return emails sent using it are consistently ignored, so I&#039;m guessing it&#039;s Corante.) But Corante can&#039;t explain why the number of contributors has dropped to one rather infrequent poster, or why Copyfight won&#039;t move to a new host even given the growing evidence that its current one is past its sell-by date...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote &#8220;no&#8221; to &#8220;blong&#8221;. Avoiding clutter helped catapult Google to glory, which should tell you something.</p>
<p>I also recommend dumping the link to Copyfight. It&#8217;s really gone to pot of late. For months the rate of addition of new material has been declining, to the point that it&#8217;s now abysmal (<i>maybe</i> one new post in a given week), and there have been technical problems that developed, but were not fixed (even when pointed out) &#8212; the &#8220;remember me&#8221; feature (which I note is lacking here) quit working (but wasn&#8217;t removed, either) and their &#8220;blinks&#8221; started to always show as having zero comments, however many they actually had.</p>
<p>But the final straw is censorship(!) &#8212; they changed something recently so all comments go through moderation, rather than appearing immediately, and to make matters worse, began to reject the vast majority of (non-link-spam) comments, including all from anonymizer IPs (such as The Cloak). They also seem to have blackholed at least one large Canadian ISP, without explanation or even acknowledgement, and which from what I&#8217;ve been able to determine is the broadband monopoly in the capital city(!) and large chunks of the surrounding area.</p>
<p>Whether this is Copyfight or their host, Corante, misbehaving, I don&#8217;t know; but it probably doesn&#8217;t matter. (Corante has a feedback form, and messages with valid return emails sent using it are consistently ignored, so I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s Corante.) But Corante can&#8217;t explain why the number of contributors has dropped to one rather infrequent poster, or why Copyfight won&#8217;t move to a new host even given the growing evidence that its current one is past its sell-by date&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
